Effective November 13th, 2009, we updated our Closing Instructions from Revision B to Revision C. There were no major changes, everything was clerical and does not affect the actual closing of the product (as stated in Important Notes 1). The following is a list of changes / corrections: 1) making all Closure Instruction formats (printed and web) identical; 2) printing to a landscape format so that the weather resistant closing instructions are identical; 3) one version of Rev. B was called QAP / PQ 080 another was QEP / PQ 080. QAP and QEP have been removed; 4) one version of Rev. B had the word “CAUTION” another had “IMPORTANT” in a box that was located to the right of the table for the fitting torques. This box has now been removed and the information within it has been placed into important note #2; 5) one version of Rev. B said “Ring ends must not touch” another had “Max. Gap” in figure #6. Rev. C now has the correct verbiage of “Ring ends must not touch”; and 6) The formatting of Figure #7 and #8 was not identical in all versions of Rev. B. All of the refinements noted in Rev. C are valid to close all product manufactured under Rev. B. Once again, the revisions are clerical and do not affect the closing of the product. Also, Rev. C is available in English and Spanish. It is critical that you retain Closure Instructions that were in effect when a product was purchased.
Drum It Up! Steel Drum Industry News, Trends, and Issues
Archive for 2009
An offset to our industrial culture is that we live among hazardous materials.
We need to protect ourselves, our families, our friends and the general population from the adverse effects of hazardous materials. Government regulations are very specific about what and how hazmats need to be safely stored and transported. Following the regulatory requirements can be difficult, sometimes confusing, sometimes open ended, but if you don’t follow these regulations, you are endangering all types of life, and risking regulatory fines, litigation, and even incarceration. During our current economic climate, with companies looking to reinvent themselves, I urge you to not lose sight of the importance of regulatory compliance for dangerous goods storage and shipments. Budgets are tight, most profits are down, and this is not the time to cut corners on compliance. Verify that any hazmat packaging supplier is providing appropriate, compliant containers. Like anything else, there are minimum specifications to be met and be sure that your suppliers are delivering the mil-thickness and quality of the steel that was ordered. Know your suppliers, tour their facilities, and be confident in their product integrity. In other words, find someone you can trust and stick with them – it will pay off in the long run.
After many years of experimentation, Pinot Noir has unquestionably carved itself a nice little niche in the wine world. Clearly the “red” of choice in Oregon, winemakers are now starting to compete in many California regions as well. Recently, we learned that a current Skolnik customer located in northern California, who in the past would not consider aging wine in stainless steel, has been experimenting with both our 30 gal and 55 gal stainless steel drums. Much to his surprise, the new aging technique that he developed has been extremely positive, and even led to sizeable sale to a high-end San Francisco caterer. It seems the best Pinots are coming from smaller wineries, which are willing to take the time and care to work with such a fragile grape. Because of its thin skin, Pinot Noir is more susceptible to frost and other weather damage. Furthermore, when some of a crop is compromised, unlike other wine types, it’s not as easy to compensate with other grapes. Demand for the Pinot Noir is very strong and consumers are finding it to be a rather versatile wine, and very food friendly.
With the introduction of Performance Oriented Packaging in the 1990’s, UN certification of packagings in the US were either performed by a self-certifying manufacturer (CFR 178.503(a)(8), (f)(6)) or by sending packagings to a third-party test lab. Whether self-certified or lab tested, the protocol for performing the non-bulk UN tests is spelled out in CFR 178.600, but, with the DOT’s Tobyhanna Test Lab claiming that packaging’s are failing their validity testing, many of the third-party test labs came together to examine the differences between their test procedures.
The labs established 6 test subject groups in order to examine the following: report requirements, conditioning, filling substances, pressure testing, drop testing, and stack testing.
Examples of the protocol concerns include issues such as: identification of key information required for a completed certification report, whether a fill substance is affected by the testing environment temperature, clarification of the compression or freestanding weight systems used to demonstrate stack height, and the correct equipment and methodology necessary to properly perform a hydrostatic test. This meeting indicated that there are many questions that need to be answered in order for test labs to perform their tests consistently. It looks like a long road ahead, but one that will greatly benefit all HazMat shippers that suffer non-compliance actions due to improper testing.